Rochester Library Will Censor Web Viewing
Decision by library's board members causes some tense back-and-forth
By: Jed Nottingham
Posted: 05/24/2007
ROCHESTER, N.Y. -
A ban on pornographic websites at Monroe County libraries
was adopted Wednesday, according to the
Rochester Democrat & Chronicle. The
move not only leaves city and county leaders at odds on
whether or not the decision counts as censorship, but also on
how the new policy will be implemented.
The move is expected to preserve county funding for the
Central Library of Rochester. However, the two boards that
oversee policies for the central library and the county
library system were under threat of having the central
library shut down by County Executive Maggie Brooks over a
long-held policy that had let adult patrons — upon request —
unblock potentially inappropriate or pornographic websites.
To satisfy Brooks and retain $6.6 million in county aid, the
Monroe County Library System board, despite the objections of
the Rochester Public Library board, approved a new policy
recommended by a library task force formed in February.
The policy, which is expected to extend to all libraries in
the county, calls for use of the library's Internet-filtering
system to block all pornographic sites unless — after a
written request — an administrator deems a site appropriate
for a patron to view. While the county library board adopted
the policy, there was no clear sense of how to implement it.
Because the county board manages the libraries' Internet
system, the board's vote usurps any policy by town and city
libraries.
However, the city library system and each town library are
governed by their own boards and have their own Internet
policy, so library officials said it remains unclear how the
policies would mesh.
Another big issue concerns what librarians will deem
pornographic. Since both library boards didn't approve the
policy, officials were unsure whether the new policy would
extend to the central library. Also, it's uncertain what
impact the policy would have on existing rules at town
libraries, each of which has its own boards — although many
town libraries already prevent pornographic material from
being unblocked.
The issue over viewing pornographic websites at the central
library has been debated since Brooks railed against current
policies after a television station in February showed
patrons viewing adult sites at the downtown library.
Brooks said Wednesday she's pleased with the direction the
library boards seem to be taking. "People are coming into
that library prior to this policy being changed, accessing
pornography and putting children, families, and other library
patrons at risk," she said. "And that's unacceptable in a
public institution funded by taxpayer money."
Wednesday's meeting stirred strong emotions, with board
members arguing what impact the policy would have on First
Amendment rights. John Lovenheim, president of the city
library board, blasted the policy and criticized Brooks for
trying to dictate content at the library. He said the policy
would create a dangerous precedent that could allow political
leaders to threaten the library if, for example, a book on
abortion or human evolution was not pulled.
"How dare she dictate to adults in this community what they
can and cannot see," Lovenheim said. "How dare she use her
power to impose her personal views on us."
Lovenheim, despite approving the task force's
recommendations, asked the library boards to approve a
resolution to require the county legislature to adopt a law
banning pornography at libraries. It failed.
Others contended that Brooks was putting the boards in a
difficult situation.
About 70 percent of the central library's budget comes from
the county.
"It really wasn't our decision at all," said city board
member Katharine Parsons. "The decision was made the moment
Ms. Brooks wrote her letter, and it was a decision made by a
moral minority of one."
Nevertheless, Brooks and supporters said libraries
constantly make decisions about what materials are
appropriate, and that's not censorship.
"If adopting the recommendation is censorship, then this
library is already in big trouble," said Bill Smith, the
Republican majority leader of the county legislature and a
county library board liaison, "[The] act of choosing books is
censorship and [you] have a collection policy that implies
and, in fact, results in rejection of material all the time."
The new county policy states that an adult patron would have
to request in writing that a website be unblocked. The
request would be reviewed by the library director or "his or
her delegate," and a determination would be made in
accordance with the Library Collection Development Policy.
The city library board on Wednesday voted to lift the
moratorium and allow for the unblocking of any site deemed
R-rated. Lovenheim said, for example, that MySpace was being blocked
by the filtering system.
The Rochester Public Library board, which oversees all city
libraries, may vote next week on the policy. Its members
didn't vote Wednesday, in part because they wanted more time
to review the task force's report.